Stable chromosomal B12 operon integration into E. coli Nissle 1917 via CRISPR

Background and motivation
B12 deficiency is framed as a solved problem in wealthy countries, just take a supplement. But in low resource environments where supplements are unavailable, unaffordable, or supply chains are unreliable, like my home country I recently visited as a vegan, this answer fails completely. B12 deficiency is already a serious public health issue in parts of South Asia and Sub Saharan Africa. Veganism and plant forward diets are effectively inaccessible without a reliable B12 source in these contexts.
The actual biological solution, gut bacteria producing B12 in situ, works fine for ruminants. It fails in humans because our synthesis happens below the ileal absorption site. The question I’m exploring: can we engineer around this?
I propose using Chassis: E. coli Nissle 1917, chosen for it’s established gut colonization ability, existing clinical probiotic use.
Delivery: Heat shock transformation to introduce Cas9 + gRNA + B12 operon construct. Plasmid carries CRISPR machinery for chromosomal integration at a safe harbor locus, then gets lost naturally post-editing, the impermanence of the plasmid becomes a feature, leaving only the stable chromosomal insert.
Why chromosomal integration rather than plasmid maintenance? Ther is no antibiotic selection pressure in vivo. Plasmid only approach loses expression within weeks.
Operon source: Aerobic B12 biosynthesis pathway from Propionibacterium freudenreichii. Full pathway is approximately 30 genes

I’m specifically asking whether a functional minimal subset has been characterized that would reduce integration complexity.

Wildtype Nissle 1917 produces no B12. Post-transformation, cobalt chloride supplementation feeds the pathway cofactor. Testing for methylcobalamin output confirms functional expression without requiring sequencing access. A microbiological assay using Lactobacillus delbrueckii as a B12 auxotroph provides a simple quantification method.

Has a minimal functional B12 operon been charconstruct fewer than 30 genes that still produces physiologically meaningful output?
What safe harbor loci are recommended for Nissle 1917 specifically? I’ve seen literature referencing lacZ and agaI in K-12 strains but Nissle’s genome differs.
Any published data on colonization persistence of chromosomally engineered Nissle strains in vivo?
Does anyone have experience with Addgene shipping to non-standard countries, or alternative sources for Cas9/gRNA constructs?

Most importantly, i would love some feedback on this project :3

I love this idea lol. B12 in low-resource areas is kinda brillian.One biological snag: humans absorb B12 in the small intestine, but Nissle 1917 lives in the colon. If the bacteria pump out B12 there, it’s past the absorption point. You’d basically be making B12-rich waste. You’d need a chassis that stays in the upper GI, like a Lactobacillus strain, which is way harder to engineer.Also, that 30-gene operon is huge. Getting 40kb into a chromosome in one go with Cas9 is a nightmare. Instead of the chromosome, check out Nissle’s pMUT1 and pMUT2 plasmids. They stay put without antibiotics and work like pseudo-chromosomes.
Since the absorption thing is so tricky inside the body, what about a fermentation approach? Use the strain as a starter for a drink or food. You grow the B12 in a jar, then drink it. It fixes the absorption problem and fits the DIY vibe better.I can help you look into Lactobacillus if you’re set on the gut route, but fermentation feels way more doable for a home setup.